Core Web Vitals: What They Actually Mean for Your Business

Google measures three things called Core Web Vitals: LCP, FID, and CLS.

These sound technical. They are.

But they affect your revenue directly.

Here’s what they mean in business terms, how they impact your bottom line, and which ones to fix first.

Reading time: 10 minutes

What Are Core Web Vitals (Plain English)

Google measures how fast and stable your website feels to users.

The three metrics:

LCP - Largest Contentful Paint

Technical: Time until the largest visible element loads.

Plain English: How long until the main content appears.

User experience: “How long do I stare at a blank screen?”

Good: Under 2.5 seconds

Poor: Over 4 seconds

Business impact:

  • Every second delay = 7% conversion loss
  • Slow LCP = users bounce before seeing your content

FID - First Input Delay (replaced by INP in 2024)

Technical: Time between user interaction and browser response.

Plain English: How long after I click before something happens.

User experience: “Did my click work? Should I click again?”

Good: Under 100 milliseconds

Poor: Over 300 milliseconds

Business impact:

  • Slow FID = users click multiple times, get frustrated, leave
  • Forms feel broken
  • Buttons feel unresponsive

CLS - Cumulative Layout Shift

Technical: How much visible content moves unexpectedly.

Plain English: Does content jump around while loading?

User experience: “I was about to click that button but an ad loaded and now I clicked the wrong thing.”

Good: Under 0.1

Poor: Over 0.25

Business impact:

  • Users accidentally click wrong buttons
  • Forms are frustrating to fill out
  • Feels unprofessional and broken

Real Revenue Impact (Not Just Rankings)

Core Web Vitals affect your business in two ways.

Impact 1: Google Rankings

How much it matters:

  • Small ranking factor
  • Not as important as content quality or backlinks
  • But all else equal, faster site wins

Reality check: A slow site with great content beats a fast site with weak content.

Don’t sacrifice content quality to chase perfect scores.

Impact 2: Conversion Rates (Much Bigger Impact)

Real data:

Amazon:

  • Every 100ms delay = 1% revenue loss

Google:

  • Half-second delay = 20% drop in traffic

Walmart:

  • Every 1 second improvement = 2% conversion increase

Your business:

  • LCP over 4 seconds = 50% bounce rate
  • LCP under 2.5 seconds = 20% bounce rate
  • Difference: 60% more people stay on your site

Revenue calculation:

Example: E-commerce site

  • 10,000 visits/month
  • Current LCP: 4.5 seconds (50% bounce)
  • 5,000 people see your products
  • 2% convert = 100 sales
  • $100 average order = $10,000 revenue

After improving LCP to 2.3 seconds:

  • 10,000 visits/month
  • New LCP: 2.3 seconds (20% bounce)
  • 8,000 people see your products (60% more)
  • 2% convert = 160 sales
  • $100 average order = $16,000 revenue
  • $6,000/month increase = $72,000/year

Cost to fix LCP: $0-500 (often free, sometimes requires better hosting)

ROI: 14,400% if you pay $500 to fix it

Which Metric Matters Most for Your Business

Not all Core Web Vitals are equally important.

E-commerce: LCP is Critical

Why: Product images are usually the LCP element.

Problem: Large, unoptimized product images = slow LCP = users bounce before seeing products.

Priority:

  1. LCP (most important)
  2. CLS (second - users hate layout shifts during checkout)
  3. FID (third - buttons usually respond fine)

Quick win: Optimize images. Use WebP format. Lazy load below-the-fold images.

SaaS / Web Apps: FID/INP is Critical

Why: Users interact heavily (clicking buttons, filling forms, using interface).

Problem: Slow JavaScript = clicking feels broken = frustrated users cancel signup.

Priority:

  1. FID/INP (most important)
  2. LCP (second - slow dashboard load is annoying)
  3. CLS (third - layout shifts less common in apps)

Quick win: Remove unused JavaScript. Defer non-critical scripts.

Blogs / Content Sites: LCP and CLS Matter

Why: Users come to read. They need content to load fast and stay still.

Problem: Ads and images cause layout shifts. Large hero images slow LCP.

Priority:

  1. LCP (most important - users want to read)
  2. CLS (second - ads shifting content is infuriating)
  3. FID (third - not much interaction on blog posts)

Quick win: Reserve space for ads so they don’t cause shifts. Optimize hero images.

Lead Gen / Service Sites: LCP and CLS for Forms

Why: Goal is form submission. Users need to fill out forms without frustration.

Problem: Images slow LCP. Layout shifts make forms annoying.

Priority:

  1. CLS (most important - form shifts = users give up)
  2. LCP (second - fast landing page = more form views)
  3. FID (third - forms usually respond fine unless heavy JS)

Quick win: Set explicit width/height on all images. Remove layout-shifting elements near forms.

Quick Wins by Metric

LCP Quick Wins

Problem: Large image loads slowly.

Fixes (in order of impact):

  1. Optimize images (5-10 minutes)

    • Convert to WebP format
    • Compress with TinyPNG or Squoosh
    • Impact: 30-50% LCP improvement

  2. Use CDN for images (30 minutes)

    • Cloudflare, Cloudinary, or ImgIX
    • Serves images from server closest to user
    • Impact: 20-40% LCP improvement

  3. Preload LCP image (10 minutes)

    • Add to <head>: <link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero.jpg">
    • Browser loads it immediately
    • Impact: 10-30% LCP improvement

  4. Remove render-blocking resources (30-60 minutes)

    • Defer non-critical CSS
    • Move JavaScript to bottom or defer
    • Impact: 20-50% LCP improvement

Expected improvement: 1-2 seconds off LCP

Time: 1-2 hours

Cost: $0 (free tools)

FID/INP Quick Wins

Problem: JavaScript blocks the main thread.

Fixes (in order of impact):

  1. Remove unused JavaScript (30 minutes)

    • Check Coverage tab in Chrome DevTools
    • Remove plugins you don’t use
    • Impact: 30-60% FID improvement

  2. Defer non-critical JavaScript (15 minutes)

    • Add defer attribute: <script defer src="script.js">
    • Loads scripts after page is interactive
    • Impact: 40-70% FID improvement

  3. Use code splitting (60 minutes, technical)

    • Load only JavaScript needed for current page
    • Requires build tool changes
    • Impact: 50-80% FID improvement

  4. Upgrade hosting (if on slow shared hosting)

    • Move to faster server
    • More CPU = faster JS execution
    • Impact: 20-50% FID improvement

Expected improvement: 100-200ms off FID

Time: 1-3 hours

Cost: $0-50/month (if upgrading hosting)

CLS Quick Wins

Problem: Elements load and shift content down.

Fixes (in order of impact):

  1. Set explicit dimensions for images (30 minutes)

    • Add width and height: <img src="photo.jpg" width="800" height="600">
    • Browser reserves space before image loads
    • Impact: 50-80% CLS improvement

  2. Reserve space for ads (15 minutes)

    • Add min-height to ad containers
    • Prevents shift when ad loads
    • Impact: 30-60% CLS improvement

  3. Use font-display: swap (5 minutes)

    • Add to @font-face: font-display: swap;
    • Shows fallback font immediately instead of blank text
    • Impact: 20-40% CLS improvement

  4. Avoid inserting content above existing content (varies)

    • Don’t add banners that push content down
    • Load dynamic content in reserved space
    • Impact: Eliminate CLS entirely if done right

Expected improvement: CLS from 0.25 to under 0.1

Time: 1-2 hours

Cost: $0

When to Prioritize vs When to Ignore

Prioritize Core Web Vitals If:

High traffic, low conversion:

  • 10,000+ visits/month but under 2% conversion
  • Improving speed could unlock significant revenue

E-commerce:

  • Every fraction of a second = more sales
  • Easy to calculate ROI

Mobile-heavy traffic:

  • Mobile users are more sensitive to slow sites
  • Mobile Core Web Vitals often worse than desktop

Competitive niche:

  • Competitors have better scores
  • All else equal, you’re losing to faster sites

Paid traffic:

  • Paying for clicks that bounce due to slow site
  • Wasted ad spend

De-prioritize Core Web Vitals If:

Low traffic:

  • Under 1,000 visits/month
  • Fixing other things (content, SEO, marketing) will have bigger impact

High conversion already:

  • 5%+ conversion rate
  • Speed isn’t your limiting factor

Content quality issues:

  • Thin content, no value proposition, unclear offering
  • Fix these first before optimizing speed

B2B with patient users:

  • Enterprise buyers will wait for complex dashboards
  • Not as sensitive to 1-2 second delays

News/urgency content:

  • Breaking news sites
  • Users will wait if content is valuable enough

How to Check Your Core Web Vitals

Method 1: PageSpeed Insights (Free, Quick)

  1. Go to PageSpeed Insights
  2. Enter your URL
  3. Wait 30-60 seconds
  4. See scores for Mobile and Desktop

Pros:

  • Free
  • Fast
  • Google’s official tool

Cons:

  • Only tests one page at a time
  • Lab data (simulated), not real user data

Method 2: Google Search Console (Free, Real Users)

  1. Go to Search Console > Experience > Core Web Vitals
  2. See real user data from actual visitors
  3. Shows which pages have poor, needs improvement, or good scores

Pros:

  • Real user data (field data)
  • Shows all your pages
  • Free

Cons:

  • Need enough traffic for data
  • Updated weekly, not real-time

Method 3: Surmado Scan (Fast, Actionable)

  1. Run Scan ($25-50)
  2. Get Core Web Vitals scores plus prioritized fix list
  3. See exact elements causing issues
  4. Get implementation guide

Pros:

  • Specific fixes with priority
  • Technical and non-technical explanations
  • Full site audit, not just one page

Cons:

  • Costs $25-50 (but saves hours of diagnosis)

Run Scan to check Core Web Vitals

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Chasing 100/100 Score

Problem: Obsessing over perfect PageSpeed score.

Reality:

  • 90+ is great
  • 80-89 is good enough for most businesses
  • Going from 90 to 100 has minimal business impact

Better approach: Get to 80-90, then focus on content and marketing.

Mistake 2: Ignoring Mobile

Problem: Only checking desktop scores.

Reality:

  • 60-70% of traffic is mobile
  • Mobile scores are usually worse
  • Google ranks based on mobile performance

Fix: Always check mobile scores first.

Mistake 3: Optimizing the Wrong Pages

Problem: Fixing homepage while product pages are slow.

Reality: Optimize pages that drive revenue:

  • Product pages (e-commerce)
  • Landing pages (lead gen)
  • Pricing page (SaaS)
  • Blog posts with highest traffic

Fix: Run Scan on your top 5 revenue-driving pages, not just homepage.

Mistake 4: Breaking Functionality for Speed

Problem: Removing critical features to improve scores.

Reality:

  • Chat widget adds 500ms but drives 20% of conversions
  • Removing it for better score = revenue loss

Fix: Optimize around critical features. Don’t remove them.

Expected Timeline

Week 1: Quick Wins

  • Optimize images (WebP, compression)
  • Add width/height to images
  • Defer non-critical JavaScript

Expected improvement:

  • LCP: 1-2 seconds faster
  • CLS: 50-70% better

Weeks 2-3: Deeper Fixes

  • Set up CDN
  • Remove unused JavaScript
  • Fix render-blocking resources

Expected improvement:

  • LCP: 30-40% additional improvement
  • FID: 50-70% better

Month 2: Monitoring and Iteration

  • Monitor real user data in Search Console
  • Track conversion rate changes
  • Fine-tune based on impact

Expected improvement:

  • Conversion rate: 10-30% increase
  • Revenue: Measurable uplift

The Bottom Line

Core Web Vitals are three speed metrics Google measures:

  • LCP: How fast main content loads
  • FID/INP: How fast site responds to clicks
  • CLS: How much content jumps around

Business impact:

  • Small ranking factor
  • Big conversion factor (every second = 7% conversion loss)

Priority by business type:

  • E-commerce: LCP first
  • SaaS: FID/INP first
  • Blogs: LCP and CLS
  • Lead gen: CLS first

Quick wins:

  • Optimize images (1-2 hours, free)
  • Defer JavaScript (30 minutes, free)
  • Set image dimensions (30 minutes, free)

Expected ROI: $500 fix can generate $72,000/year in additional revenue for typical e-commerce site.

Don’t chase 100/100 scores. Get to 80-90 and focus on content and marketing.

Related Reading: