Can I Use Signal for Pre-Acquisition Due Diligence?

Yes. Signal reveals how AI platforms see a target company before you acquire them. uncovering reputation risks, competitive positioning, and hidden liabilities for $50.

Surmado does not sell AI placements and cannot submit your site to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Meta AI, Grok, or DeepSeek. No one can. We test how these systems already talk about you and give you a plan to improve.

Reading time: 10 minutes

What you’ll learn:

• How to use Signal reports ($50) to test target companies’ AI visibility, reputation, and competitive positioning pre-acquisition
• Real example: How a $50 Signal report revealed visibility gaps that saved $6M in price renegotiation
• Red flags to look for: zero presence in core personas, negative sentiment across platforms, high ghost influence, and declining trends
• Green flags indicating strong acquisition targets: 60%+ presence rate, 70+ authority score, and low ghost influence
• Step-by-step workflow for running pre-acquisition Signal reports and cross-referencing with traditional due diligence

Why it matters: Traditional due diligence misses AI perception. You analyze financials, legal, operations. But not how ChatGPT describes the target to potential customers. Signal fills that gap in 15 minutes.

---

The Hidden Risk in M&A: AI Reputation

Standard due diligence covers:

• Financial statements (revenue, profit, debt)
• Legal liabilities (lawsuits, IP disputes)
• Customer contracts (churn, concentration risk)
• Operations (team, tech stack, processes)

What standard due diligence misses:

• How AI platforms describe target’s reputation
• Competitive positioning in AI-assisted search
• Ghost influence (target’s features attributed to competitors)
• Negative sentiment in AI responses

The gap: Buyer acquires target, then discovers AI platforms recommend competitors or flag reputation issues. Too late to renegotiate price.

---

Real Example: SaaS Acquisition Gone Wrong

Background:

• PE firm acquires marketing analytics SaaS ($3M ARR, 8x revenue multiple = $24M deal)
• Standard due diligence: Clean financials, No lawsuits, 85% retention
• Didn’t run Signal

Post-acquisition discovery (3 months later):

• ChatGPT consistently recommends 3 competitors when asked for marketing analytics tools
• Target company: Not mentioned in 12 of 15 persona queries
• Perplexity flags “pricing complaints” and “poor customer support” in recommendations
• Ghost influence: 72% (AI describes target’s features but recommends competitors)

Business impact:

• Organic trial signups: -35% in first 6 months post-acquisition
• Customer acquisition cost (CAC): $850 → $1,400 (AI-driven discovery declining)
• PE firm had to invest $500K in AI visibility optimization (not in original plan)

What $50 Signal report would have revealed:

1. Target has poor AI visibility (bottom quartile vs competitors)
2. AI platforms flag reputation issues (pricing, support)
3. Competitive positioning weak (ranked #6-8 out of 10 in category)
4. Renegotiation opportunity: Lower purchase price by $2M-3M to account for AI visibility gap

Lesson: $50 Signal report could have saved $2M+ in price negotiation or $500K in post-acquisition fixes.

---

How Signal Works for Pre-Acquisition Due Diligence

Step 1: Test Target Company’s AI Visibility

What Signal measures:

1. Presence Rate

• How often target is mentioned when AI answers buyer persona queries
• Benchmark: 60%+ is good, <30% is red flag

Example: Target is mentioned in only 3 of 15 persona queries (20% presence) Implication: Poor discoverability → CAC will increase post-acquisition

2. Authority Score

• How confidently AI recommends target (0-100 scale)
• Benchmark: 70+ is strong, <50 is weak

Example: Target has 42 Authority Score (competitors: 78, 85, 91) Implication: AI hedges recommendations (“you might consider [Target]” vs “I recommend [Competitor]”)

3. Competitive Ranking

• Where target ranks vs competitors in AI responses
• Benchmark: Top 3 is strong, #5+ is concerning

Example: Target ranks #7 out of 10 in category Implication: AI-driven buyers will choose 6 competitors before considering target

4. Ghost Influence

• Percentage of target’s unique features described but attributed to competitors
• Benchmark: <25% is good, >50% is red flag

Example: 68% ghost influence (AI describes target’s features but recommends competitors) Implication: Target is educating market but competitors capture customers

---

Step 2: Identify Reputation Risks

What Signal reveals:

Negative sentiment in AI responses:

• Pricing complaints (“expensive for small teams”)
• Support issues (“slow response times”)
• Product gaps (“lacks enterprise features”)
• Churn signals (“high cancellation rate”)

Real example from Signal report:

Perplexity response: “[Target] is a marketing analytics tool, though users have noted concerns about pricing transparency and customer support responsiveness. Alternatives like [Competitor A] and [Competitor B] offer similar features with more predictable pricing.”

Translation: AI is actively steering buyers away from target due to reputation issues.

Due diligence implication:

• Validate reputation claims (check G2, Trustpilot, support ticket data)
• Price adjustment: Discount deal value to account for reputation remediation costs
• Post-acquisition plan: Fix support, pricing transparency (budget $200K-500K)

---

Step 3: Validate Growth Projections

Standard due diligence:

• Seller provides growth projections (e.g., “$3M ARR → $6M ARR in 24 months”)
• Buyer validates with customer contracts, pipeline, historical growth

Signal adds:

• Test if AI-driven buyer discovery supports growth projections
• If target has 20% AI visibility and competitors have 70%, projected growth is at risk

Real example:

Seller’s projection: $3M → $6M ARR (100% growth, 24 months)

Signal findings:

• Presence Rate: 18% (bottom decile)
• Authority Score: 38 (competitors: 75+)
• Ghost influence: 71%

Revised projection:

• If AI visibility stays constant: $3M → $3.8M ARR (27% growth, not 100%)
• To hit $6M: Need $400K investment in AI optimization + 12-18 months

Outcome: Buyer renegotiates purchase price from 8x revenue ($24M) to 6x revenue ($18M) to account for AI visibility gap.

Savings: $6M due to $50 Signal report

---

What to Look For in Target’s Signal Report

Red Flags

1. Zero Presence in Core Personas

• Target not mentioned when AI answers buyer queries in their primary market
• Implication: Reliant on paid acquisition, not organic AI discovery
• Action: Discount deal value or plan $300K+ AI optimization budget

2. Negative Sentiment in 3+ Platforms

• ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude all flag reputation issues (pricing, support, product gaps)
• Implication: Systemic reputation problem (not isolated platform issue)
• Action: Deep dive into customer reviews, support tickets, churn data

3. High Ghost Influence (>60%)

• AI describes target’s unique features but recommends competitors
• Implication: Competitors are free-riding on target’s market education efforts
• Action: Price discount OR post-acquisition content strategy to reclaim attribution

4. Declining Trend (if running quarterly reports)

• Target’s presence, authority, or ranking declining over past 6-12 months
• Implication: Competitive positioning eroding (not just snapshot weakness)
• Action: Investigate competitive dynamics (new entrants? better content from rivals?)

5. Platform Variance >50%

• Target ranks #2 on ChatGPT but #9 on Perplexity
• Implication: Visibility not diversified (over-reliant on one platform)
• Action: Risk if ChatGPT changes algorithm or if buyer behavior shifts to Perplexity

---

Green Flags

1. High Presence (60%+) in Core Personas

• Target mentioned in majority of relevant buyer queries
• Implication: Strong organic discoverability (reduces CAC post-acquisition)
• Action: Validate acquisition thesis (visibility = competitive moat)

2. Authority Score 70+

• AI confidently recommends target (“I recommend [Target]” not “you might consider”)
• Implication: Strong brand equity in AI training data
• Action: Premium pricing justified (strong market position)

3. Low Ghost Influence (<25%)

• Target’s features correctly attributed (not stolen by competitors)
• Implication: Effective content/brand strategy
• Action: Retain target’s marketing team post-acquisition (they’re doing something right)

4. Positive Competitive Positioning

• Target ranks Top 3 vs competitors in AI responses
• Implication: Market leader perception (even if revenue isn’t #1 yet)
• Action: Growth projections more credible (AI visibility supports scaling)

5. Consistent Cross-Platform Performance

• Target ranks similarly across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini
• Implication: Diversified visibility (not reliant on one platform)
• Action: Lower risk of algorithm changes hurting discoverability

---

How to Run Pre-Acquisition Signal Report

Step 1: Create Buyer Personas for Target’s Market

Use target’s ideal customer profile (ICP) to write 3-5 realistic buyer queries.

Example (for marketing analytics SaaS target):

Persona 1 (Agency owner):

“I run a 15-person marketing agency. We need analytics software to track campaign performance across Google Ads, Facebook, and email. What do you recommend for under $500/month?”

Persona 2 (In-house marketer):

“Our CMO wants better attribution reporting. We’re using Google Analytics but need something that connects ad spend to revenue. What tools integrate with Salesforce?”

Persona 3 (E-commerce brand):

“I manage marketing for a Shopify store. We’re spending $50K/month on ads but can’t figure out which channels drive actual sales. What analytics tool should we use?”

Step 2: Submit Signal Report for Target Company

• Enter target’s business name, website, description
• Add 3-5 custom personas (from Step 1)
• Select AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini minimum)

Step 3: Analyze Results

Review target’s:

• Presence Rate (mentioned in X% of queries)
• Authority Score (how confidently recommended)
• Competitive ranking (vs known competitors)
• Ghost influence (features described but misattributed)
• Sentiment (positive, neutral, negative)

Step 4: Cross-Reference with Standard Due Diligence

Financial DD:

• Low AI visibility + high CAC → Explains why customer acquisition is expensive
• High ghost influence → Competitors benefiting from target’s content investment

Customer DD:

• Negative sentiment in AI → Cross-check with G2 reviews, NPS scores
• AI mentions “pricing complaints” → Validate with customer interviews

Competitive DD:

• AI ranks target #7 of 10 → Confirms target is mid-tier player (not market leader)
• Competitors with higher Authority Scores → Identify acquisition targets instead?

---

Pricing for Pre-Acquisition Due Diligence

Signal report: $50 (one-time)

Traditional alternatives:

• Brand health survey: $15K-30K (4-6 weeks)
• Market research firm competitive analysis: $25K-50K (8-12 weeks)
• In-house analyst research: 80+ hours ($8K-15K labor cost)

ROI examples:

• $50 Signal report reveals red flags → Save $2M-6M in price renegotiation
• $50 report confirms green flags → Justify premium pricing (buy at 9x revenue vs 7x)
• $50 report identifies reputation risks → Budget $300K post-acquisition fixes (not surprise)

---

Other M&A Use Cases for Signal

Use Case 1: Acqui-Hire Validation

Scenario: Acquiring small startup primarily for team (not product)

Signal test:

• Check if startup’s product has any AI visibility (hidden value?)
• Discover if competitors are mentioning startup’s innovations (IP value?)
• Validate if acqui-hire makes sense (if product has strong AI presence, keep it)

Example: Bought startup for $2M (acqui-hire), discovered product had 65% presence in niche category → Kept product, now generates $500K ARR

---

Use Case 2: Competitive Acquisition Defense

Scenario: Prevent competitor from acquiring target

Signal test:

• Run Signal on target to assess strategic value
• If target has high ghost influence (educating market for you), acquire to eliminate threat
• If target has low AI visibility, let competitor overpay

Example: Competitor bid $10M for target. Signal revealed target had 12% presence (weak). Let competitor acquire. Competitor now struggling with integration of low-visibility brand.

---

Use Case 3: Post-Acquisition Benchmarking

Scenario: Track if acquisition improves AI visibility

Signal test:

• Run Signal on target pre-acquisition (baseline)
• Re-run quarterly post-acquisition
• Measure if parent company’s brand lifts target’s visibility

Example: SaaS acquired startup, integrated branding, re-ran Signal after 6 months:

• Presence: 22% → 58%
• Authority Score: 41 → 73
• Validation: Acquisition created value (visibility synergies working)

---

Limitations: What Signal Doesn’t Cover

Signal is NOT a replacement for:

• Financial due diligence (revenue quality, unit economics)
• Legal due diligence (IP, contracts, litigation)
• Technical due diligence (code quality, infrastructure)
• Customer due diligence (retention cohorts, NPS)

Signal IS a complement:

• AI perception layer (how platforms describe target to buyers)
• Competitive positioning validation (vs seller’s claims)
• Reputation risk screening (sentiment in AI responses)
• Growth projection reality check (AI visibility supports scaling?)

Best practice: Run Signal alongside traditional DD (not instead of)

---

The Bottom Line

Pre-acquisition due diligence traditionally costs $100K-500K and takes 8-16 weeks. Signal ($50) adds AI perception layer in 15 minutes.

Real results:

• PE firm: $50 Signal report revealed target’s AI visibility gap → Renegotiated price from $24M to $18M ($6M savings)
• Strategic acquirer: $50 report confirmed target’s strong positioning → Justified premium price (9x revenue vs 7x)
• Startup acquirer: $50 report flagged reputation risks → Budgeted $400K post-acquisition fixes (not surprise)

One Signal report reveals how AI platforms see your target. before you sign the term sheet.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I run Signal on private companies (pre-acquisition targets)?

Yes. Signal works for any business with online presence (website, reviews, mentions). Private companies, public companies, even pre-revenue startups.

What if target is small and AI doesn’t know about them?

That’s valuable data. If AI has zero awareness of target (0% presence), you know:

1. Acquisition is purely for team/tech (not brand/market position)
2. Post-acquisition, you’ll need to invest in visibility
3. Seller’s growth projections relying on “organic discovery” are unrealistic

Should I tell the seller I’m running Signal on them?

Not required. Signal uses publicly available data (how AI responds to queries about target). It’s equivalent to Googling the target or reading reviews. standard DD practice.

Can I run Signal on multiple acquisition targets to compare?

Yes. Run Signal on 3-5 targets, compare:

• Presence Rate (who has strongest discoverability?)
• Authority Score (who has strongest brand equity?)
• Ghost influence (who has best attribution of unique features?)
• Use data to rank acquisition targets

How often should I run Signal during M&A process?

Timeline:

• Initial screening (week 1-2): Run Signal on shortlist of 3-5 targets
• Deep DD (week 4-6): Re-run Signal with target-specific personas (more detailed)
• Post-acquisition (quarterly): Track if integration improves target’s visibility

What if Signal reveals red flags but financials look great?

Two scenarios:

1. Misalignment: Target has great revenue but poor AI visibility

   • Implication: Revenue from old channels (referrals, paid ads), not AI-driven organic
   • Risk: Future growth may be harder (AI discovery declining)
   • Action: Discount deal or plan investment in AI optimization

2. Hidden strength: Target has great revenue AND strong AI visibility

   • Implication: Multiple growth drivers (both old + new channels working)
   • Action: Premium pricing justified (competitive moat)

Can Signal detect fake reviews or manipulated data?

Partially. Signal shows if AI cites low-quality review sites or flags sentiment mismatches (e.g., target claims “5-star service” but AI mentions “support complaints”). But Signal doesn’t audit review authenticity. use specialized tools for that.

Is this legal? (Testing target’s AI visibility without permission)

Yes. Signal uses publicly available data (how AI platforms respond to queries). Equivalent to:

• Googling the target company
• Reading G2/Trustpilot reviews
• Checking competitor comparisons

No different than standard market research during DD.

---

Ready to test a target company’s AI perception before acquisition? Run a Signal report ($50) and uncover reputation risks, competitive positioning, and hidden liabilities. before you sign the term sheet.