Surmado Solutions vs Traditional Consultants: Detailed Comparison

Quick answer: Solutions ($50, 15-20 minutes) and traditional consultants ($5k-50k, weeks-months) both provide strategic recommendations, but serve different needs. Solutions uses adversarial AI debate (6 models challenging each other) for rapid, unbiased analysis of straightforward decisions. Consultants provide deep industry expertise, custom research, implementation support for complex transformations. Choose Solutions for: fast decisions, budget constraints, unbiased perspectives. Choose consultants for: industry-specific expertise, implementation help, political buy-in needed.

Reading time: 14 minutes

In this guide:

• Solutions costs $50 with 15-20 minute delivery vs consultants at $5K-500K over weeks-months where Solutions provides 6-AI adversarial debate (CFO/COO/Market Realist/Game Theorist/Chief Strategist/Wildcard) for clear-cut decisions while junior consultants ($5K-15K, 2-4 weeks) deliver desk research PowerPoints and senior consultants ($50K-500K, 2-6 months) provide deep transformation support
• Solutions delivers zero-bias AI analysis vs consultant methodology bias where 6 AI models challenge each other’s assumptions (CFO’s “hire 2 reps” countered by Game Theorist’s “competitor hires faster” and Wildcard’s “sales model broken”) while human consultants have firm methodology bias (McKinsey restructuring, Deloitte tech) and billable hours incentives
• Use Solutions for budget-constrained rapid decisions ($50 vs $5K minimum) when you need strategic advice by Monday (board meeting, investor deadline), unbiased third-party analysis breaking internal team deadlock, or straightforward binary choices (invest $30K in AI visibility vs $20K in SEO), saving $4,950 + 2 weeks vs junior consultant
• Use consultants for complex transformations requiring industry expertise like multi-state HVAC expansion needing regulatory analysis/licensing requirements/financial modeling/implementation roadmap, healthcare SaaS HIPAA compliance strategy requiring deep healthcare IT knowledge, or politically complex decisions needing executive workshops and stakeholder alignment that Solutions can’t provide
• Combine both strategically by running Solutions first ($50, 15-20 min) to validate if decision is clear-cut (implement yourself) or complex (hire consultant for deep dive), using Solutions to evaluate competing consultant proposals ($50K vs $75K vs $100K) for negotiation leverage, or having consultants do custom research ($15K) then using Solutions ($50) for unbiased recommendation synthesis

Bottom line: Solutions = AI-powered rapid strategy for clear-cut decisions. Consultants = human expertise for complex, nuanced transformations.

---

Feature Comparison Table

Feature	Solutions ($50)	Junior Consultant (~$5k)	Senior Consultant (~$50k+)
Price	$50 flat	$5k-15k (small project)	$50k-500k (major engagement)
Timeline	15-20 minutes	2-4 weeks	2-6 months
Analysis Method	6-AI adversarial debate (CFO, COO, Market Realist, Game Theorist, Chief Strategist, Wildcard)	Human consultant + templates	Team of consultants + custom research
Bias	None (AI models challenge each other)	Low (junior, less experienced)	Medium (firm methodology, billable hours incentive)
Industry Expertise	General business strategy	Basic (1-3 years experience)	Deep (10+ years, industry-specific)
Custom Research	No (analyzes your inputs only)	Limited (desk research)	Yes (primary + secondary research)
Implementation Support	No (recommendations only)	Limited (playbook, no execution)	Yes (full implementation team)
Political Buy-In	No (no stakeholder management)	Limited	Yes (workshop facilitation, exec alignment)
Quantitative Analysis	Yes (if Signal/Scan token provided)	Limited	Yes (full financial modeling)
Risk Assessment	Yes (6-model perspectives)	Limited	Yes (scenario analysis, sensitivity)
Deliverable	PDF report (6-model debate, prioritized recommendations, risk assessment)	PowerPoint deck + playbook	PowerPoint + financial model + implementation plan
Ongoing Support	No (one-time analysis)	No (project ends)	Yes (retainer, follow-up)
Speed	Instant (about 15-20 min)	Weeks (2-4)	Months (2-6)
Best For	Clear-cut decisions, budget constraints, speed needed	Small businesses, basic strategy	Complex transformations, exec alignment, implementation

---

When to Use Solutions

Scenario 1: Budget Constraints

Problem: Need strategic advice but can’t afford $5k-50k consultant fees

Solutions approach: $50 for 6-AI adversarial debate

Example:

• Question: “Should we invest in AI visibility optimization ($30k) or traditional SEO ($20k) this quarter?”
• Solutions: 6 models debate ROI, risks, competitive timing
• Output: Prioritized recommendations (e.g., “Hybrid: 60% AI visibility, 40% SEO”)
• Cost: $50
• Timeline: 15-20 minutes

Consultant alternative: $5k minimum (junior consultant, 2 weeks)

Savings: $4,950 + 2 weeks faster

---

Scenario 2: Fast Decision Needed

Problem: Need recommendation by Monday (board meeting, investor deadline)

Solutions approach: 15-20 minute turnaround

Example:

• Friday 4 PM: Submit question to Solutions
• Friday 4:20 PM: Receive 6-model debate report
• Monday 9 AM: Present recommendations to board

Consultant alternative: 2-4 weeks minimum (even for rush projects)

Advantage: 100× faster

---

Scenario 3: Unbiased Perspective

Problem: Internal teams have conflicting opinions, need neutral third-party analysis

Solutions approach: 6 AI models with different perspectives (CFO focuses on ROI, Market Realist on competitive timing, Wildcard on edge cases)

Example:

• Internal debate: Marketing wants aggressive AI visibility spend, Finance wants conservative approach
• Solutions: CFO model agrees with Finance (ROI uncertainty), Game Theorist agrees with Marketing (competitive urgency), Chief Strategist recommends phased approach
• Output: Balanced recommendation with all perspectives represented

Consultant alternative: Human consultant may have:

• Firm methodology bias (McKinsey always recommends restructuring, Deloitte recommends tech)
• Billable hours incentive (longer engagement = more revenue)
• Previous client bias (applies same solution to different problems)

Advantage: Zero bias (AI models have no financial incentive)

---

Scenario 4: Clear-Cut Decision

Problem: Binary choice with quantifiable options (A vs B, clear metrics)

Solutions approach: 6-model analysis of pros/cons, risks, recommendations

Example:

• Question: “Should we spend $25k on Signal Pro quarterly tracking or $50k on traditional brand awareness survey?”
• Options: Clear (Signal vs survey)
• Metrics: Clear (AI visibility vs traditional brand metrics)
• Solutions: Analyzes ROI, risks, competitive advantage for both options
• Output: Prioritized recommendation

Consultant alternative: Overkill (junior consultant could do this, but costs $5k and takes 2 weeks)

Advantage: Solutions sufficient for straightforward decisions

---

When to Use Consultants

Scenario 1: Complex Transformation

Problem: Multi-year strategic transformation (e.g., digital transformation, market expansion, M&A integration)

Consultant approach: Team of 3-10 consultants, 2-6 months, $50k-500k

Example:

• Challenge: Expand from local HVAC company (Phoenix) to multi-state operation (AZ, NM, TX, NV)
• Consultant work:
  • Market research (demand, competition, pricing in each state)
  • Regulatory analysis (licensing requirements per state)
  • Operational model (centralized vs decentralized)
  • Financial modeling (5-year projections)
  • Implementation roadmap (phase 1: NM, phase 2: TX, phase 3: NV)
  • Change management (training, stakeholder alignment)
• Timeline: 3-6 months
• Cost: $100k-300k

Solutions alternative: Not suitable (too complex, requires custom research, implementation support)

Advantage: Consultants provide depth, research, implementation that Solutions can’t

---

Scenario 2: Industry-Specific Expertise Needed

Problem: Decision requires deep industry knowledge (regulations, competitive dynamics, technical nuances)

Consultant approach: Senior consultant with 10+ years in your industry

Example:

• Challenge: Healthcare SaaS company deciding HIPAA compliance strategy for AI features
• Consultant expertise needed:
  • HIPAA regulations (BAA requirements, encryption standards)
  • Healthcare AI precedents (FDA guidance, liability)
  • Competitive landscape (what other healthcare AI companies are doing)
  • Customer expectations (hospitals vs private practices)
• Solutions: General business strategy (no healthcare-specific knowledge)
• Consultant: Healthcare IT specialist with HIPAA expertise

Advantage: Consultants bring industry-specific knowledge Solutions lacks

---

Scenario 3: Political Buy-In Required

Problem: Recommendation needs executive alignment, stakeholder management, workshop facilitation

Consultant approach: Consultants run workshops, build consensus, manage politics

Example:

• Challenge: CMO wants AI visibility investment, CFO skeptical, CEO undecided
• Consultant process:
  • Workshop 1: Align on business goals (what success looks like)
  • Workshop 2: Evaluate options (AI visibility vs alternatives)
  • Workshop 3: Scenario analysis (best case, worst case, most likely)
  • Executive presentation: Facilitate decision (address CFO concerns, build consensus)
• Solutions: Provides analysis, but no stakeholder management

Advantage: Consultants facilitate buy-in, Solutions provides data for humans to socialize

---

Scenario 4: Implementation Support Needed

Problem: Recommendation is only valuable if executed (need implementation team)

Consultant approach: Consultants stay for implementation (Phase 1: Strategy, Phase 2: Execution)

Example:

• Challenge: Recommendations from Solutions say “Optimize AI visibility with schema markup, persona-based content, citation-worthy expertise pages”
• Solutions output: What to do (clear recommendations)
• Implementation gap: How to do it (technical execution, content creation, schema coding)
• Consultant approach: Phase 1 (Strategy, $50k) + Phase 2 (Implementation, $100k) = $150k total
  • Phase 2: Write schema markup, create 50 persona pages, build citation strategy
• Solutions: No implementation support (recommendations only)

Advantage: Consultants do the work, Solutions tells you what to do (you do it yourself)

---

Cost Comparison

Small Decision (< $50k at stake)

Example: Choose between Signal Essential ($25/month) vs Gumshoe ($49/month) for quarterly tracking

Solutions: $50, 15-20 minutes

• 6-model analysis
• Pros/cons of each tool
• Recommendation based on your use case

Junior Consultant: $5k, 2-4 weeks

• Desk research on both tools
• Spreadsheet comparison
• 20-slide PowerPoint deck

ROI: Solutions saves $4,950 + 2 weeks

---

Medium Decision ($50k-500k at stake)

Example: Invest $200k in AI visibility optimization vs $150k in traditional SEO

Solutions: $50, 15-20 minutes

• 6-model adversarial debate
• Risk assessment (AI platform algorithm changes, competitive response)
• Recommendation (e.g., “Hybrid: $120k AI, $80k SEO”)

Junior Consultant: $10k-20k, 4-6 weeks

• Competitive analysis
• ROI projections (basic financial modeling)
• Risk assessment
• 40-slide PowerPoint

Senior Consultant: $50k-100k, 2-3 months

• Deep competitive research (interview competitors, industry analysts)
• Financial modeling (5-year projections, sensitivity analysis)
• Scenario planning (3 scenarios: aggressive, moderate, conservative)
• Implementation roadmap
• Executive workshops

ROI:

• Solutions sufficient if decision is straightforward (clear metrics, low political complexity)
• Junior consultant if need moderate research (budget allows $10k)
• Senior consultant if decision is high-stakes ($500k+ impact) or politically complex

---

Large Transformation (> $1M at stake)

Example: Multi-year digital transformation ($2M investment)

Solutions: $50, 15-20 minutes

• High-level analysis (not sufficient for $2M decision)

Senior Consultant: $200k-500k, 6-12 months

• Comprehensive transformation roadmap
• Change management strategy
• Implementation support
• Ongoing optimization

ROI: Consultant necessary (Solutions too high-level for $2M decision)

Use Solutions for: Sub-decisions within transformation (e.g., “Which AI platforms to optimize for first?” = $50 Solutions analysis)

---

Speed Comparison

Decision Urgency	Solutions	Junior Consultant	Senior Consultant
Emergency (need answer today)	15-20 min	2+ weeks	2+ months
Urgent (need answer this week)	15-20 min	Rush fee ($10k+)	Not possible
Normal (2-4 weeks acceptable)	15-20 min	2-4 weeks	Rush fee
Strategic (3-6 months acceptable)	15-20 min	2-4 weeks	2-6 months

Solutions advantage: Always fast (15-20 min), regardless of urgency

Consultant limitation: Minimum 2-4 weeks (even for simple questions)

---

Deliverable Comparison

Solutions Deliverable

PDF report includes:

1. Question Analyzed: Your strategic question
2. 6-Model Adversarial Debate:
   • CFO perspective (ROI, cost, financial risk)
   • COO perspective (operational feasibility, execution complexity)
   • Market Realist perspective (competitive timing, market trends)
   • Game Theorist perspective (strategic dynamics, competitor response)
   • Chief Strategist perspective (alignment with goals, optionality)
   • Wildcard perspective (edge cases, unconventional risks)
3. Prioritized Recommendations: Top 3-5 actions ranked by priority
4. Risk Assessment: Key risks + mitigation strategies
5. Scenario Analysis (if quantitative analysis included): Best case, worst case, most likely outcomes

Format: PDF (6-15 pages), Intelligence Token (JSON via API)

Learn more: What Can Solutions Tell Me

---

Junior Consultant Deliverable

PowerPoint deck includes (20-40 slides):

1. Executive summary (3-5 slides)
2. Situation analysis (current state, problem definition)
3. Options considered (2-4 alternatives)
4. Pros/cons analysis (spreadsheet-style comparison)
5. Recommendation (1-2 slides)
6. Next steps (implementation checklist)
7. Appendix (desk research, assumptions)

Format: PowerPoint + Excel (financial model if applicable)

Timeline: 2-4 weeks

---

Senior Consultant Deliverable

Comprehensive deck includes (60-100+ slides):

1. Executive summary (5-10 slides)
2. Situation analysis (market research, competitive landscape)
3. Strategic options (3-5 scenarios)
4. Financial modeling (5-year projections, NPV, IRR, sensitivity)
5. Risk analysis (scenario planning, mitigation strategies)
6. Implementation roadmap (phase 1, 2, 3 with timelines)
7. Change management plan (stakeholder analysis, communication strategy)
8. Appendix (primary research, interview summaries, detailed assumptions)

Format: PowerPoint + Excel (complex financial model) + implementation playbook

Timeline: 2-6 months

---

Deliverable Winner: Depends on Complexity

Solutions sufficient: Clear-cut decisions (binary choice, simple metrics)

Junior consultant needed: Moderate research required (competitive landscape, basic financial modeling)

Senior consultant needed: Complex decisions (multi-year transformation, deep industry research, financial modeling, implementation)

---

Combining Solutions + Consultants

Pattern 1: Solutions First, Consultant If Needed

Workflow:

1. Run Solutions ($50, 15-20 min)
2. Review 6-model debate
3. If recommendation clear + low risk → implement yourself
4. If recommendation unclear or high risk → hire consultant for deep dive

Example:

• Question: “Should we invest $50k in AI visibility or $50k in traditional SEO?”
• Solutions output: “Hybrid recommended (60% AI, 40% SEO), medium risk”
• Decision: Recommendation clear, implement ourselves (no consultant needed)
• Savings: $5k-50k consultant fees

Alternative outcome:

• Solutions output: “High risk due to competitive response uncertainty, need deeper market research”
• Decision: Hire junior consultant ($10k) for competitive analysis
• ROI: Solutions saved 2 weeks + narrowed consultant scope (saving $5k-10k)

---

Pattern 2: Consultant Proposals + Solutions Evaluation

Workflow:

1. Get proposals from 3 consultants ($50k, $75k, $100k)
2. Run Solutions: “Which consultant proposal offers best ROI for our specific situation?”
3. Solutions analyzes pros/cons of each proposal
4. Use Solutions recommendation to negotiate with consultant

Example:

• Consultant A: $50k, 2 months, basic research
• Consultant B: $75k, 3 months, deep research + workshops
• Consultant C: $100k, 4 months, full implementation support
• Solutions recommendation: “Consultant B offers best balance (deep research needed for this decision, but implementation not necessary)”
• Decision: Hire Consultant B, negotiate to $70k
• Savings: $30k (vs Consultant C)

---

Pattern 3: Consultants for Research, Solutions for Decisions

Workflow:

1. Hire consultant for custom research ($10k-20k)
2. Consultant delivers market research, competitive analysis, financial projections
3. Run Solutions with consultant research as input
4. Solutions provides unbiased recommendation (removes consultant bias)

Example:

• Consultant: Delivers 100-slide deck with market research ($15k, 4 weeks)
• Solutions: Analyzes consultant’s research + 6-model debate
• Output: Solutions catches consultant bias (consultant recommended expensive option, Game Theorist model flags cheaper alternative works too)
• Savings: $50k (avoided over-investing based on consultant recommendation)

---

Use Case Recommendations

Use Solutions If…

Budget: $50-500 available (not $5k-50k)

Timeline: Need answer in 24 hours or less

Decision type: Clear-cut binary choice (A vs B)

Complexity: Straightforward (quantifiable options, clear metrics)

Bias concern: Want unbiased analysis (no firm methodology, no billable hours incentive)

Industry expertise: General business strategy sufficient (no niche industry knowledge needed)

Implementation: You have internal team to execute recommendations

Political complexity: Low (no need for stakeholder workshops, alignment facilitation)

---

Use Consultant If…

Budget: $5k-500k available (ROI justifies cost)

Timeline: 2+ weeks acceptable (or willing to pay rush fee)

Decision type: Complex transformation (multi-year, multi-stakeholder)

Complexity: High (requires custom research, industry expertise, financial modeling)

Industry expertise: Need deep industry knowledge (regulations, competitive nuances)

Implementation: Need consultant to execute (not just recommend)

Political complexity: High (need workshops, stakeholder alignment, executive buy-in)

Ongoing support: Need retainer relationship (quarterly strategy reviews)

---

Use Both If…

Large transformation with sub-decisions:

• Consultant: Overall transformation strategy ($200k, 6 months)
• Solutions: Sub-decisions along the way (e.g., “Which AI platforms to prioritize?” = $50 each)

Consultant evaluation:

• Get consultant proposals
• Use Solutions to evaluate which consultant offers best ROI

Research + unbiased decision:

• Consultant: Custom research ($15k)
• Solutions: Unbiased analysis of consultant’s research ($50)

---

Common Questions

Can Solutions replace consultants entirely?

For straightforward decisions: Yes ($50 Solutions sufficient).

For complex transformations: No (consultants provide research, implementation, political buy-in that Solutions can’t).

Rule of thumb: If decision is < $50k at stake and clear-cut, Solutions likely sufficient. If > $500k at stake or politically complex, consultant likely needed.

---

Do consultants use AI tools like Solutions?

Some do (McKinsey has internal AI tools, BCG uses AI for research). But traditional consultant model is human-led (AI assists, doesn’t replace).

Solutions is AI-first (6 AI models debate, humans review recommendations).

---

Can I share Solutions output with consultants?

Yes. Use Solutions as starting point:

• Run Solutions ($50)
• Share 6-model debate with consultant
• Consultant builds on Solutions analysis (saves time, reduces consultant scope/cost)

Example: Solutions identifies 3 strategic options, consultant does deep dive on option #1 (vs consultant identifying options from scratch).

---

Which gives better recommendations: AI (Solutions) or humans (consultants)?

For clear-cut decisions: AI often better (faster, unbiased, considers multiple perspectives simultaneously)

For complex decisions: Humans better (industry expertise, nuance, political judgment)

Best: AI + human (Solutions for rapid analysis, consultant for complex execution)

---

Can Solutions handle industry-specific questions?

General business strategy: Yes (CFO, COO, Market Realist models understand business fundamentals)

Deep industry nuance: Limited (Solutions doesn’t have 10 years of healthcare or manufacturing experience)

Example:

• “Should we invest in AI visibility or SEO?” → Solutions handles well (general strategy)
• “Should we expand to Texas given ERCOT regulations and local HVAC licensing requirements?” → Consultant needed (industry-specific expertise)

---

Do I need to provide data to Solutions?

Optional but recommended: Provide Signal/Scan Intelligence Token for quantitative analysis

Example with quant:

• Input: Signal token showing 28% Presence Rate, 68% Ghost Influence
• Solutions: 6-model debate with context (“You have attribution gap, CFO model prioritizes fixing Ghost Influence first”)

Example without quant:

• Input: Question only (“Should we invest in AI visibility?”)
• Solutions: General strategy analysis (still valuable, but less customized)

---

How much do consultants typically cost?

Hourly rates:

• Junior consultant: $150-300/hour
• Senior consultant: $300-500/hour
• Partner/Principal: $500-1,000/hour

Project-based (typical):

• Small project: $5k-20k (2-4 weeks, 1 consultant)
• Medium project: $50k-150k (2-3 months, 2-3 consultants)
• Large project: $200k-500k+ (6-12 months, 5-10 consultants)

Solutions: $50 flat (no hourly fees, no scope creep)

---

Final Recommendation

Start with Solutions ($50, 15-20 min):

• Get rapid 6-model analysis
• Identify if decision is clear-cut (implement yourself) or complex (hire consultant)
• Save $5k-50k if Solutions sufficient

Hire consultant if Solutions reveals:

• High complexity (custom research needed)
• High risk (scenario analysis, financial modeling needed)
• Implementation support needed
• Political buy-in required

Use both for large transformations:

• Consultant: Overall strategy + implementation
• Solutions: Sub-decisions along the way

---

Want to try Solutions? Run Solutions ($50) for 6-AI adversarial debate, prioritized recommendations, risk assessment. Delivered in about 15-20 minutes. Optionally include Signal/Scan Intelligence Token for quantitative analysis. 7-day money-back guarantee.