AI Visibility vs Gumshoe: Detailed Comparison
AI Visibility vs Gumshoe: Detailed Comparison
Quick answer: AI Visibility and Gumshoe both test AI visibility, but differ in platform coverage, API access, and pricing. AI Visibility tests 7 AI platforms for $50, includes Intelligence Token API for automation, persona-based testing. Gumshoe tests 4 platforms for $49, no API access, keyword-focused. Choose AI Visibility for: more platforms, automation, cheaper tier. Choose Gumshoe for: established brand, simpler interface.
Surmado does not sell AI placements and cannot submit your site to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Meta AI, Grok, or DeepSeek. No one can. We test how these systems already talk about you and give you a plan to improve.
Reading time: 10 minutes
In this guide:
- AI Visibility tests 7 AI platforms vs Gumshoe’s 4 where AI Visibility covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Meta AI, Grok, and DeepSeek (56 total queries) while Gumshoe tests ChatGPT/Gemini/Perplexity/Claude only (about 40 queries), missing DeepSeek (growing in Asia), Meta AI (3B+ Facebook/Instagram users), and Grok (X/Twitter ecosystem)
- AI Visibility includes Intelligence Token API, Gumshoe has no API where AI Visibility provides permanent JSON access (https://api.surmado.com/intelligence/{TOKEN}) for Zapier/Make/n8n automation, historical tracking, and agency dashboards, while Gumshoe requires manual copy/paste from PDF for each report
- AI Visibility costs $50, Gumshoe costs $49 where AI Visibility ($50) tests more platforms (7 vs 4) with API access, AI Visibility ($50) adds strategic recommendations + PowerPoint for $1 more than Gumshoe’s single tier, delivering better value for agencies running 10+ monthly reports
- AI Visibility uses persona-based testing (natural language), Gumshoe uses keywords where AI Visibility tests conversational queries (“Emergency AC repair Phoenix same-day service”) matching real AI user behavior vs Gumshoe’s SEO-style keywords (“AC repair Phoenix”), with AI Visibility creating 50+ variations from your 3-7 personas
- AI Visibility delivers in about 15 minutes, Gumshoe in about 24 hours where AI Visibility provides same-day reports for urgent Monday meetings vs Gumshoe’s next-day turnaround, with both offering competitive analysis with 56 queries but AI Visibility showing 4 core metrics (Presence Rate, Authority Score, Ghost Influence, Category Share) vs Gumshoe’s 1 primary metric
Bottom line: Both are solid tools. AI Visibility offers better value and technical features (API, more platforms), Gumshoe offers more established presence and simplicity.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | AI Visibility | AI Visibility | Gumshoe |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $50 | $50 | $49 |
| AI Platforms Tested | 8 | 8 | 4 |
| Standard Platforms | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Meta AI, Grok | Same | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude |
| Competitive Platforms | ChatGPT Search, Perplexity | Same | None |
| Sample Size | 56 queries (7 per platform) | 56 queries | about 40 queries (10 per platform) |
| Testing Approach | Persona-based (natural language) | Persona-based | Keyword-based |
| Presence Rate | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Authority Score | Yes | Yes | No |
| Ghost Influence | Yes | Yes | No |
| Category Share | Yes | Yes | No |
| Platform Variance | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitive Analysis | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Strategic Recommendations | No (use Strategy) | Yes | Yes |
| Intelligence Token API | Yes | Yes | No |
| Automation Support | Yes (Zapier, Make, n8n) | Yes | No (manual only) |
| Delivery Time | about 15 minutes | about 15 minutes | about 24 hours |
| Report Format | PDF + JSON | PDF + PowerPoint + JSON | |
| Refund Policy | 7-day money-back | 7-day money-back | Not specified |
AI Platforms Tested
AI Visibility (8 Platforms)
Standard platforms (Q1-Q9 queries):
- ChatGPT (OpenAI GPT-4)
- Claude (Anthropic)
- Gemini (Google)
- DeepSeek (DeepSeek-V3)
- Meta AI (Meta AI)
- Grok (xAI)
Competitive platforms (Q10 competitive queries): 7. ChatGPT with search (web-grounded) 8. Perplexity (citations-heavy)
Total queries: 7 × 6 standard + 7 × 2 competitive = 56 queries
Gumshoe (4 Platforms)
Platforms tested:
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Claude
Total queries: about 40 queries (10 per platform, estimated)
Missing: DeepSeek, Meta AI, Grok, ChatGPT Search
Platform Coverage Winner: AI Visibility
AI Visibility advantage: 8 platforms vs 4 (2x coverage)
Why it matters:
- DeepSeek growing fast in Asia/global markets
- Meta AI integrated into Facebook/Instagram (3B+ users)
- Grok unique to X/Twitter ecosystem
- ChatGPT Search competitive queries test web-grounded AI
Gumshoe advantage: Focuses on most popular platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini dominant in US)
Testing Methodology
AI Visibility: Persona-Based Testing
Approach: Natural language buyer queries
Example personas:
- “Emergency AC repair Phoenix same-day service weekend”
- “Moving companies DFW area reliable disciplined teams”
- “CRM software with robust API and Zapier integration”
Variations: 50+ test queries derived from your 3-7 personas
Why: Matches how people actually use AI (conversational, context-rich)
Learn more: What is Persona-Based Testing
Gumshoe: Keyword-Based Testing
Approach: SEO-style keyword queries
Example keywords (inferred):
- “AC repair Phoenix”
- “Moving companies Dallas”
- “CRM software”
Why: Familiar to SEO-focused teams, simpler to understand
Limitation: May not reflect actual AI user behavior (people ask questions, not keywords)
Methodology Winner: Depends on Use Case
Choose AI Visibility if: You want to test how AI responds to natural buyer language (closer to real-world usage)
Choose Gumshoe if: Your team thinks in SEO keywords and wants familiar approach
Metrics Provided
AI Visibility Metrics
Core metrics:
- Presence Rate (0-100%): Organic mention frequency across all queries
- Authority Score (0-100): Positioning quality when mentioned (requires ≥1 mention)
- Ghost Influence (0-100%): Features discussed without attribution
- Category Share (0-100%): % of total brand mentions in your category
Platform variance: Per-platform breakdown (ChatGPT: 52%, Claude: 38%, etc.)
Competitive analysis: Top 10 competitors with Presence Rates
Learn more: Understanding AI Visibility Report
Gumshoe Metrics
Core metrics:
- Presence Rate: Mention frequency (similar to AI Visibility)
- Platform variance: Per-platform breakdown
- Competitive analysis: Competitor mentions
Not included:
- Authority Score (positioning quality)
- Ghost Influence (attribution gap)
- Category Share (market share of mentions)
Metrics Winner: AI Visibility
AI Visibility advantage: more thorough with 150+ checks metrics (4 vs 1 primary metric)
Authority Score value: Presence Rate alone doesn’t show if you’re recommended strongly or weakly. Authority Score fills that gap.
Ghost Influence value: Critical for brands with unique features that AI discusses without credit (e.g., Veterans Moving America’s 100% veteran workforce credited to competitor)
API Access and Automation
AI Visibility: Intelligence Token API
Every report includes:
- Intelligence Token (format:
SIG-YYYY-MM-XXXXX) - API endpoint:
https://api.surmado.com/intelligence/{TOKEN} - JSON response with all metrics
- No authentication required (token is the key)
Use cases:
- Zapier/Make/n8n workflow automation
- Google Sheets custom functions
- Notion database integration
- Custom dashboards (fetch data programmatically)
- Historical tracking (compare Q1 vs Q4)
- Agency client reporting (20 clients, automated)
Example: Automatic Google Sheets row when AI Visibility report delivered (no manual copy/paste)
Learn more: API Integration Overview
Gumshoe: No API
Delivery: PDF report only
Access: Manual download from dashboard
Automation: Not supported
Tracking: Manual spreadsheet updates
For agencies: Manually copy metrics for each client
API Winner: AI Visibility (Gumshoe has no API)
AI Visibility advantage: Automation-ready for agencies, developers, anyone managing multiple reports
Gumshoe limitation: Manual workflows only. If you run monthly reports for 20 clients, you’ll manually copy data 20 times.
Future: Gumshoe may add API (check their roadmap). As of November 2025, no API available.
Pricing and Value
AI Visibility Pricing
**** ($50):
- All 7 AI platforms tested
- 56 queries
- Core metrics (Presence Rate, Authority Score, Ghost Influence, Category Share)
- Intelligence Token API
- PDF report
- 7-day refund
Pro ($50):
- Everything in
- Strategic recommendations (detailed analysis)
- PowerPoint export (client-ready)
- Deeper competitive insights
- 7-day refund
Learn more: AI Visibility vs Pro
Gumshoe Pricing
Standard ($49):
- 4 AI platforms tested
- about 40 queries
- Presence Rate metric
- PDF report
- Refund policy not publicly specified
No tiers: Single pricing (no /Pro options)
Value Comparison
For basic visibility testing:
- AI Visibility: $50 (8 platforms, API access)
- Gumshoe: $49 (4 platforms, no API)
- Winner: AI Visibility (better platform coverage, half the price)
For strategic analysis:
- AI Visibility: $50 (strategic recommendations + all metrics + API)
- Gumshoe: $49 (basic recommendations, fewer platforms, no API)
- Winner: AI Visibility (more thorough with 150+ checks for $1 more)
For agencies (20 clients/month):
- AI Visibility: $500-1,000/month ( or Pro) + automation saves 10 hours/month
- Gumshoe: $980/month + 10 hours manual data entry
- Winner: AI Visibility (cheaper + automation ROI)
Report Delivery and Formats
AI Visibility
Delivery time: about 15 minutes (not guaranteed, load-dependent)
Formats:
- ****: PDF + Intelligence Token (JSON via API)
- Pro: PDF + PowerPoint + Intelligence Token
PowerPoint (Pro only): Client-ready slides with charts, competitive analysis, recommendations
JSON: All metrics as structured data (automation-friendly)
Gumshoe
Delivery time: about 24 hours (reported by users)
Formats: PDF only
No structured data export: Manual copy if needed for tracking
Delivery Winner: AI Visibility
Speed: 15 minutes vs 24 hours (95× faster)
Flexibility: Multiple formats (PDF, PowerPoint, JSON) vs PDF only
Use case: Need report for Monday meeting? AI Visibility delivers same day. Gumshoe may take until Tuesday.
Competitive Analysis Depth
AI Visibility
Competitor identification: Automatic (AI platforms mention competitors organically)
Top 10 competitors shown with:
- Presence Rate for each
- Rank (1-10)
- Competitive gap (your rate - competitor rate)
Example:
- Competitor A: 54% (Rank #1, Gap: -12 points)
- Competitor B: 38% (Rank #3, Gap: +4 points)
- You: 42% (Rank #2)
Platform-specific: See which competitors dominate ChatGPT vs Claude
Gumshoe
Competitor identification: Automatic
Top competitors shown with Presence Rates (exact count not specified)
Analysis: Comparison table
Competitive Analysis Winner: Tie
Both provide: Competitor Presence Rates, rankings, comparisons
AI Visibility edge: More platforms = more competitor data (8 vs 4 platforms)
Gumshoe edge: Simpler presentation (less overwhelming for beginners)
Use Case Recommendations
Choose AI Visibility If You…
Need automation:
- Run monthly reports for multiple clients (agencies)
- Want automatic tracking dashboard (Google Sheets, Notion)
- Integrate with existing workflows (Zapier, Make)
Want comprehensive metrics:
- Need Authority Score (positioning quality)
- Track Ghost Influence (attribution gaps)
- Monitor Category Share (market share)
Value platform coverage:
- Target global markets (DeepSeek popular in Asia)
- Care about Meta AI (Facebook/Instagram integration)
- Test Grok (X/Twitter ecosystem)
Budget-conscious:
- $50 tier sufficient for basic tracking
- Save 50% vs Gumshoe for more platforms
Need fast turnaround:
- 15 minuteute delivery vs 24 hours
Choose Gumshoe If You…
Prefer established brands:
- Gumshoe launched earlier (more market presence)
- Recognized name in AI visibility space
Want simplicity:
- Simpler metric set (Presence Rate focus)
- Less overwhelming for non-technical teams
Don’t need automation:
- Manual workflows acceptable
- Single report occasional use (not monthly tracking)
Focus on top 4 platforms only:
- ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude sufficient
- Don’t need DeepSeek, Meta AI, Grok coverage
Common Questions
Can I use both tools?
Yes. Some teams run both quarterly to cross-validate results. Presence Rates should be similar (methodology differences may cause 5-10% variance).
Which is more accurate?
Both are accurate for what they measure. Differences:
- AI Visibility tests more platforms (broader picture)
- Gumshoe tests fewer platforms (focused view)
- Methodology (persona vs keyword) affects which queries are tested
Accuracy depends on whether your customers use ChatGPT-only (Gumshoe sufficient) or diverse AI platforms (AI Visibility better).
Does AI Visibility really deliver in 15 minutes?
Most reports: Yes (about 15 minutes). Some faster (10 min), some slower (30 min) depending on load. Not an SLA, but typical turnaround. Gumshoe’s 24-hour turnaround is longer regardless of load.
Why doesn’t Gumshoe have an API?
Unknown. Gumshoe hasn’t publicly announced API plans. May be on roadmap. Contact Gumshoe directly for API timeline.
Can AI Visibility and Gumshoe test the same personas?
AI Visibility uses persona-based testing (natural language). Gumshoe uses keyword-based. You can approximate by submitting keyword-like personas to AI Visibility (e.g., “AC repair Phoenix” instead of “Emergency AC repair Phoenix same-day”), but results may differ due to platform coverage (8 vs 4).
Which tool do agencies prefer?
Agencies with 10+ clients prefer AI Visibility (API automation saves significant time). Agencies with 1-5 clients may choose either (manual workflows manageable at small scale).
Is there a bundle discount for both?
No official bundle. Run AI Visibility first (cheaper, faster, more platforms). If you need cross-validation, add Gumshoe quarterly.
Final Recommendation
For most SMBs and agencies: Start with AI Visibility ($50)
- Better platform coverage (8 vs 4)
- API access for automation
- Comprehensive metrics (4 vs 1)
- Half the price
- Faster delivery (15 min vs 24 hrs)
Upgrade to AI Visibility ($50) if you need:
- Strategic recommendations
- PowerPoint for client presentations
- Deeper competitive analysis
Try Gumshoe ($49) if you:
- Already use Gumshoe (established relationship)
- Prefer simpler, keyword-based approach
- Don’t need API or automation
- Focus on top 4 platforms only
Use both (quarterly cross-validation):
- AI Visibility for monthly tracking + automation
- Gumshoe for quarterly second opinion
Want to try AI Visibility? Try it free or Run AI Visibility ($50) for 7 AI platforms, Intelligence Token API, about 15 minute delivery. Upgrade to Pro ($50) for strategic recommendations + PowerPoint export. 7-day money-back guarantee. Already have an account? Log in.
Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
Have suggestions for improvement?
Tell us moreHelp Us Improve This Article
Know a better way to explain this? Have a real-world example or tip to share?
Contribute and earn jobs:
- Submit: Get 1 free job (AI Visibility, Site Audit, or Strategy)
- If accepted: Get an additional free job (2 total)
- Plus: Byline credit on this article